🎯 Tutorial • Question Bank & Planner • Model Essays • Vocabulary • Linking Phrases
Use Full Screen for a larger workspace. Sidebar appears only in Full Screen on tablets/desktops. In normal view, all parts are shown in full (no accordions).
🔶 Part 1 — Tutorial
Step 1 — Analyse the task & map both sides (Advantages & Disadvantages)
Read the prompt twice and underline the task focus and scope: “Cashless societies are on the rise. What are the advantages and disadvantages for individuals?”.
Notice that the question asks you to present both advantages and disadvantages for individuals (not for governments, banks, or businesses), so your ideas should be framed at the personal level: payments, budgeting, privacy, access, and daily risks.
Decide on two focused advantages you can explain with mechanisms and examples (e.g., convenience + traceability/budget control), and two focused disadvantages (e.g., exclusion of the unbanked/elderly + privacy or outage/cyber risks).
Avoid drifting into solutions unless used briefly to clarify a point; this is not a “problem–solution” task.
Sketch a balanced plan: Introduction → Body 1 (advantages) → Body 2 (disadvantages) → Conclusion (neutral synthesis).
Keep claims plausible and verifiable in principle without statistics; IELTS rewards clear reasoning over data dumps.
When choosing examples, prefer compact, realistic scenarios (“a commuter using contactless to save time”) over brand-heavy references.
Maintain individual perspective throughout: say “users,” “consumers,” “cardholders,” “app users,” or “households,” not “the economy at large.”
Decide how you will frame neutrality in the conclusion: you do not need to take sides; simply weigh which effects are more immediate vs more serious.
Finally, time your work: ~8–9 minutes planning, ~25–28 minutes writing, ~3–4 minutes checking cohesion, grammar, and word count (~280–310 words recommended).
Example Box — Decoding the Prompt (Cashless Societies)
Prompt: “Cashless societies are on the rise. What are the advantages and disadvantages for individuals?” Focus:Individuals in daily life (payments, access, privacy, budgeting, risk). Likely angles: ✅ Convenience & speed; ✅ digital records/budget control; ❌ digital exclusion; ❌ privacy & outages/cyber risk. Pitfalls: Talking about macroeconomics only; giving solutions essays; listing points without explanations.
Step 2 — Plan a clear structure & argument flow
Build a four-paragraph outline for control and balance.
In the introduction, paraphrase the trend (“more payments without cash”) and signal a balanced discussion (“this essay outlines advantages and disadvantages for users”).
Body 1 (Advantages) should start with a topic sentence labelling the side (“cashless brings practical benefits for many users”), then develop two connected reasons using a reason → mechanism → micro-example chain.
For instance, convenience leads to faster checkouts and fewer queues (mechanism), shown by contactless on public transport (example).
A second advantage, digital traceability, enables budget tracking and fraud alerts, illustrated by bank app notifications.
Body 2 (Disadvantages) mirrors the pattern: first, exclusion (people without smartphones/bank accounts; those who struggle with tech), then privacy/outage risk (data trails, hacking, network failures).
Include short, human-scale examples (an elderly person reliant on cash for local shopping; a traveller stuck during a system outage).
Use contrast linkers (however, by contrast, nevertheless) to maintain balance, and hedging where appropriate (may, can, in some cases).
In the conclusion, synthesise: cashless makes payments simpler for many, yet it can disadvantage those without digital access and raises privacy concerns.
Do not introduce new arguments there; instead, re-state scope (“for individuals”) and, if you wish, suggest that inclusive options (cash acceptance alongside digital) protect choice.
Example Box — Skeleton Plan (Advantages & Disadvantages)
Intro: Paraphrase + say you will outline pros/cons for individuals. Body 1 (Advantages): Convenience/speed → micro-example (commuter/checkout); Traceability/budget control → micro-example (app alerts). Body 2 (Disadvantages): Exclusion of unbanked/elderly → micro-example (local cash-only habits); Privacy/outage risks → micro-example (system failure while travelling). Conclusion: Neutral synthesis: benefits are practical, but risks are serious for specific groups.
Step 3 — Write balanced, high-impact paragraphs
Keep topic sentences explicit so examiners see structure immediately (“Cashless payment can benefit users through speed and simpler budgeting” / “However, reliance on digital systems can disadvantage some individuals”).
Develop each reason with a mechanism that explains how the benefit/risk is realised (e.g., near-field communication reduces transaction time; itemised transaction histories make overspending visible; multi-factor authentication reduces unauthorised use; network dependence creates single points of failure).
Use micro-examples that are realistic and concise (e.g., “a commuter tapping in during rush hour” or “an older shopper who does not own a smartphone”).
Maintain tone control: present advantages in an objective voice and handle disadvantages with empathy and specificity.
Avoid sweeping generalisations (“everyone benefits” / “cash is useless”); instead, add scope phrases (“for many card users,” “for people with limited digital access”).
Vary sentence patterns for rhythm: one concise assertion, followed by a complex explanatory sentence, then a short example.
Thread cohesion by referencing earlier ideas (“these alerts,” “such outages,” “this convenience”), and keep pronoun references clear.
Use hedges judiciously to avoid overclaiming (often, in many cases, tends to), but keep your stance firm regarding relevance to individuals.
Keep verbs precise (facilitates, enables, exposes, excludes) and prefer concrete nouns over vague ones (authentication, transaction history, connectivity).
Conclude each body paragraph with a link-back line that ties the reason to the individual user’s experience.
Example Box — High-impact Sentences (Cashless)
Advantage topic: “For many users, cashless payment improves daily routines because transactions are faster and easier to track.” Mechanism: “Contactless systems shorten queues, and app notifications show where money goes, which helps people adjust habits.” Disadvantage topic: “However, full reliance on digital tools can exclude people who lack accounts or smartphones.” Risk mechanism: “In addition, every purchase leaves a data trail, and network failures can temporarily stop people from paying.” Link-back: “Therefore, while convenience is real, the experience is not equally positive for all individuals.”
Step 4 — Language, cohesion, and accuracy
Choose precise lexis for fintech and daily use: contactless, digital wallet, authentication, transaction history, privacy, data trail, digital exclusion, outage, connectivity, fraud alert.
Balance contrast with varied devices: while, whereas, however, nevertheless, by contrast.
Use evaluative adverbs to keep nuance: largely, primarily, notably, conversely.
Keep paragraph unity: each body paragraph should develop one side with two connected reasons.
Check articles and prepositions with key nouns (access to banking, reliance on networks, benefits for users).
Avoid unprovable claims (“cash will disappear next year”); focus on mechanisms you can explain.
Maintain formal tone; avoid brand names and marketing slogans.
Proofread for agreement and punctuation, especially commas in complex sentences and hyphenation (cash-only, app-based).
Aim for clarity over jargon; define terms by context if used once.
Finally, ensure you directly answer the task in the conclusion: you outlined advantages and disadvantages for individuals and offered a neutral synthesis.
Example Box — Quick Quality Checks
Balance: Are both pros and cons developed with mechanisms and micro-examples? Relevance: Are points framed at the individual level, not only at national/business scale? Cohesion: Do contrast/evaluation linkers guide the reader naturally? Accuracy: Articles, prepositions, agreement, and hyphenation correct? Task: Conclusion synthesises rather than introduces new ideas?
Replace […] with your ideas. Keep sentences concise and focused on individuals.
Sentence-by-Sentence Scaffold
Intro S1 (Paraphrase): In many places, people are paying without cash more often.
Intro S2 (Scope): This essay outlines the main advantages and disadvantages of a cashless lifestyle for individuals.
Body 1 S3 (Advantage topic): A key benefit is [convenience/speed] because […].
Body 1 S4 (Mechanism): Contactless or app-based payments [shorten queues/reduce handling of coins], which leads to […].
Body 1 S5 (Second advantage): Another advantage is [traceability/budget control/fraud alerts], since […].
Body 1 S6 (Micro-example + link-back): For example, [brief realistic case], so many users find cashless systems [efficient/helpful].
Body 2 S7 (Disadvantage topic): On the other hand, some people face [exclusion] because […].
Body 2 S8 (Mechanism): Those without [bank accounts/smartphones] or with limited [digital skills] may struggle to pay, leading to […].
Body 2 S9 (Second disadvantage): In addition, [privacy/outage/cyber risk] can affect individuals when […].
Body 2 S10 (Micro-example + link-back): For instance, [brief realistic case], which shows that cashless systems are not equally accessible or risk-free.
Conclusion S11 (Synthesis): In summary, cashless payment often makes daily life simpler, yet it can disadvantage people who lack digital access and raises privacy concerns.
Conclusion S12 (Scope reminder): For individuals, the value of going cashless depends on [access, habits, and comfort with technology].
P1: In many countries, people increasingly pay by card or phone rather than with notes and coins. P2: As digital payment grows, everyday purchases are often made without cash.
Framing/Conclusion Options
Neutral synthesis: This approach suits many users because it is fast and trackable; however, it can disadvantage people with limited digital access. Conditional framing: Where cash and digital coexist, individuals gain choice; where cash is refused, risks for some users increase.
🔷 Part 2 — Task
[IELTS Academic] [Writing Task 2] — Task Panel
Write an essay addressing the question. Aim for 270–320 words. Organise your response into an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
Timer
40:00
Countdown & Custom Time
Default is 40 minutes. To customise, enter minutes and press Set before starting.
Question: Cashless societies are on the rise. What are the advantages and disadvantages for individuals?
Task B — New Question
Title: IELTS Academic | Writing Task 2 — Remote Work
Question: More companies are adopting remote work arrangements. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of working from home for employees.
Write Your Essay
Type your essay below. The word counter updates automatically.
Words:0
Submit for Feedback
Fill in your details. Choose to send via WhatsApp or Email. A message will be generated automatically including the exercise title, the full question, and your details.
Send Options
Notes
All controls are contained within this panel and stack vertically for mobile responsiveness.
The timer remains visible at the top-right inside this panel while you scroll.
Use the Download button to keep a copy of your essay before sending.
Below are three sample essays written with the scaffold from Part 1. Each sample exceeds 260 words and follows the “advantages & disadvantages” structure for individuals.
Explanations are provided in dark-blue boxes after each essay.
Sample Answer — Band 6 (≈290 words)
In many cities, people are paying by card or phone more often, and physical money is used less. This essay explains the main advantages and disadvantages of this change for ordinary users.
A clear advantage is convenience. Digital and contactless payments speed up daily routines because users do not have to count coins or wait for change. Tapping a card on the bus or at the supermarket shortens queues and makes small purchases quick. Another benefit is basic budget control. When payments are recorded in an app or bank statement, people can see where their money goes. If they overspend, they may notice patterns and try to fix them the following week. Some apps also send alerts about unusual activity, which can help users respond faster to possible fraud.
On the other hand, going fully cashless can create problems for some groups. People without bank accounts or smartphones can be excluded from simple activities, such as buying a ticket or paying at a café. Older users may also feel uncomfortable with new systems and worry about mistakes. In addition, privacy and reliability are concerns. Every digital payment leaves a data trail, and some users do not like their habits being visible. Systems can also fail: if there is no internet or a card network outage, people may not be able to pay at all, which is stressful in daily life or when travelling.
In summary, cashless payment is fast and often helpful for everyday organisation, but it is not equally friendly for everyone. For individuals, the value of this trend depends on access to technology, personal habits, and comfort with sharing data online.
Why this could score around Band 6 — Step-by-Step (17 points)
The introduction paraphrases the trend and announces a balanced discussion.
The essay focuses on individuals, not companies or governments.
Body 1 starts with a clear topic sentence about convenience.
Mechanism is explained (no coins, faster queues), not just listed.
Micro-examples (bus, supermarket) make the claims concrete.
Second advantage (budget control) logically connects to transaction records.
Mentions app alerts and fraud awareness to deepen the point.
Body 2 mirrors the structure with a topic sentence on exclusion.
Names specific groups (unbanked, smartphone-free, older users).
Raises privacy and reliability with brief mechanisms (data trail, outages).
Outage scenario gives a realistic daily-life risk.
Conclusion synthesises benefits and risks without new arguments.
Cohesion uses simple logical sequencing (“another,” “on the other hand”).
Vocabulary is generally appropriate but not very precise or varied.
Grammar control is adequate; mostly simple/compound sentences.
Some repetition and limited complex structures cap the band.
Task is fully addressed; development is sufficient but could be more nuanced.
Sample Answer — Band 7 (≈300 words)
Across many economies, everyday transactions are increasingly cash-free. This essay outlines the benefits and drawbacks of this shift for individual users rather than institutions.
The most immediate advantage is practical efficiency. Contactless systems reduce friction at the point of sale, which shortens queues and makes commuting or grocery shopping less time-consuming. Equally important is the financial visibility that digital payments provide. Itemised histories and instant notifications help people notice overspending, set weekly limits, and react quickly to suspicious charges. For many, these features translate into steadier budgeting and less end-of-month anxiety.
Nevertheless, the same systems can marginalise those without stable digital access. Individuals who lack bank accounts, smartphones, or confidence with apps may be pushed to the edges of public life if businesses refuse cash. There is also a trade-off between convenience and privacy: every tap creates a data trail that third parties could analyse to infer habits. Finally, reliability is not guaranteed. Network failures, battery problems, or a card provider outage can temporarily block payments, which is more than an inconvenience if a user needs medicine or transport.
Overall, cashless options often make daily life smoother and can nudge people towards better money management. However, unless cash remains available, some users will face barriers, and others will accept a level of tracking they find uncomfortable. For individuals, the ideal arrangement is choice: digital tools for speed and insight, with cash as a resilient fallback when technology or connectivity fails.
Why this could score around Band 7 — Step-by-Step (18 points)
Clear focus on individuals is signalled in the introduction.
Topic sentences guide the reader and label each side of the argument.
Advantages are developed with mechanism (reduces friction) and effect (shortens queues).
Financial visibility is explained with itemised histories and alerts.
Concrete outcomes: weekly limits, faster responses to fraud, less anxiety.
Balanced transition using “Nevertheless” to introduce disadvantages.
Exclusion is framed precisely (lack of accounts, devices, confidence).
Privacy is treated as a trade-off, showing evaluation rather than description.
Reliability risks are specific (network, battery, provider outage).
High-stakes example (medicine/transport) raises the significance logically.
Conclusion synthesises and proposes a conditional stance (choice as ideal).
Cohesion devices are varied but unobtrusive.
Lexis is more precise (friction, itemised histories, infer, resilient fallback).
Complex sentences are used with good control; punctuation largely accurate.
Task response is well-developed with relevant examples.
Minor repetition remains, but range and precision surpass Band 6.
Errors, if any, are occasional and do not impede clarity.
Word count and paragraphing meet exam expectations.
Sample Answer — Band 8+ (≈310 words)
As cashless payment becomes routine—from transit gates to market stalls—the question for individuals is not whether the trend will continue, but how it reshapes everyday experience. This essay weighs the principal advantages and disadvantages at the personal level.
On the positive side, cashless systems streamline time-critical moments and provide granular financial feedback. Near-field transactions compress the seconds spent at checkouts and turn small purchases into near-instant actions, which cumulatively frees time across a week. More subtly, digital ledgers expose spending patterns that paper receipts rarely reveal. Push notifications, category summaries, and fraud flags allow users to intervene early, whether by tightening a discretionary budget or freezing a card within minutes. For many, these features translate into steadier habits and lower cognitive load around money.
However, friction does not disappear; it is redistributed. Individuals without accounts, compatible devices, or reliable connectivity encounter new barriers precisely where cash once worked reliably. Even for digitally comfortable users, every tap writes a trace that can be collated to infer routines, preferences, and locations. While such data may enable useful services, it also narrows the sphere of privacy that cash naturally protected. Moreover, technological dependence introduces single points of failure: a dead phone battery, a network outage, or an automated fraud block can abruptly halt payment, with outsized consequences when timing matters—buying medicine, catching a train, or paying a childcare provider.
In sum, going cashless often delivers speed and insight that benefit day-to-day life, yet it simultaneously amplifies the costs of exclusion and raises principled concerns about data. For individuals, the most protective arrangement is not uniform cashlessness but pluralism: digital tools by default for convenience and control, with cash retained as a low-tech, privacy-preserving fallback when systems falter.
Why this could score Band 8+ — Step-by-Step (20 points)
Introduction is concise, precise, and clearly sets the individual scope.
Topic sentences carry analysis, not merely labels (“friction is redistributed”).
Mechanisms are technically accurate (near-field transactions, digital ledgers).
Advantages are linked to outcomes (time saved; lower cognitive load).
Tools are named functionally (push notifications, category summaries, fraud flags).
Nuanced disadvantages: exclusion, privacy inference, and system dependence.
Privacy is treated as a principled concern, not only a fear.
Failure modes are concrete (battery, network, automated block).
High-impact examples show stakes (medicine, train, childcare).
Cohesion achieved through lexical chains (friction, trace, fallback) and contrasts.
Lexical resource is wide yet controlled; collocations are strong (“privacy-preserving fallback”).
Complex sentences and punctuation are used accurately and flexibly.
Argumentation is balanced and evaluative rather than descriptive.
No new ideas in the conclusion; synthesis and stance are clear.
Consistent focus on individuals prevents task drift.
Style is formal and concise, suitable for academic tone.
Errors are rare and do not impede precision.
Paragraphing is logical; each paragraph has unity and progression.
Word count and development meet upper-band expectations.
Overall, ideas are specific, well-explained, and coherently integrated.
🔷 Part 4 — Vocabulary (10 Key Words)
[IELTS Academic] [Writing Task 2] — Key Vocabulary from the Task
Each item below includes British & American IPA, part(s) of speech, common patterns, a clear definition, an example with a gloss, useful synonyms, and frequent learner mistakes. All items are from the cashless-society context and suitable for formal essays.
Definition: using cards or digital methods instead of physical notes and coins.
Example: “Many urban stores now prefer cashless payments to speed up service.” (= card/phone payments make checkout faster)
Synonyms:card-based, digital-only (contextual)
Common mistakes: ❌ “cashlesses payments” → ✅ “cashless payments” (no plural on adjective); ❌ “cashless society need” → ✅ “a cashless society needs …” (article + agreement); ❌ using with people (“a cashless man”) → use for systems/transactions.
Part(s) of speech: noun phrase (countable, often singular)
Patterns:leave/create a data trail; track someone through a data trail
Definition: the record of digital actions that can reveal a person’s habits or movements.
Example: “Each tap leaves a data trail that can be analysed for patterns.” (= records show behaviour)
Synonyms:digital footprint
Common mistakes: ❌ pluralising “data” as “datas” → “data” is already plural/uncountable in usage; ❌ wrong verb (“do a data trail”) → ✅ “leave a data trail.”
8) (digital) exclusion
IPA (BrE/AmE): /ɪkˈskluːʒən/
Part(s) of speech: noun (uncountable; also countable in specific cases)
Patterns:digital exclusion; exclusion from services/participation
Definition: being prevented from accessing tools or services (e.g., payments) due to lack of resources or skills.
Example: “Cash refusal can lead to digital exclusion for people without bank accounts.” (= they are left out)
Synonyms:marginalisation, barrier to access
Common mistakes: ❌ preposition errors (“exclusion of services”) → often ✅ “exclusion from services”; ❌ confusing with “inclusion.”
9) outage
IPA (BrE/AmE): /ˈaʊtɪdʒ/
Part(s) of speech: noun (countable)
Patterns:network/card/payment outage; a power outage
Definition: a period when a service stops working.
Example: “During a payment outage, travellers could not buy tickets.” (= system failure blocked purchases)
Synonyms:service disruption, downtime
Common mistakes: ❌ uncountable use (“there was much outage”) → ✅ “there were several outages”; ❌ spelling (“outedge”).
10) budgeting
IPA (BrE/AmE): /ˈbʌdʒɪtɪŋ/
Part(s) of speech: noun (uncountable); verb: to budget
Patterns:household budgeting; budgeting for essentials; to budget for X
Definition: planning how to spend and save money.
Example: “Alerts and summaries support better budgeting for many users.” (= tools help plan spending)
Synonyms:money management, financial planning
Common mistakes: ❌ mixing verb/noun (“I budgeting every week”) → ✅ “I budget every week” / “My budgeting improved.”; ❌ hyphen errors (“bud-geting”).
🔶 Part 5 — Phrases & Expressions (10 Items)
[IELTS Academic] [Writing Task 2] — Key Phrases from the Task
Each expression below includes BrE & AmE IPA, part(s) of speech, common patterns, a clear definition, an example with a short gloss, useful synonyms, and frequent learner mistakes. Use them to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of cashless societies at the individual level.
1) tap to pay
IPA (BrE): /tæp tə ˈpeɪ/ IPA (AmE): /tæp tə ˈpeɪ/
Part(s) of speech: verbal phrase
Patterns:tap to pay for + noun; tap to pay at + place
Definition: to make a contactless payment by briefly touching a card/phone to a reader.
Example: “Commuters tap to pay at the gate during rush hour.” (= they pay by quick contactless tap)
Synonyms:pay contactlessly, tap-and-go
Common mistakes: ❌ “tap and pay” (different system term) → use the set phrase in your region; ❌ “tap to paid.”
