37. IELTS Writing Task 2: Studying Abroad — Do the Benefits Outweigh the Drawbacks?

Example Box — Decoding the Prompt (Studying Abroad)

Prompt: “Studying abroad is increasingly popular. Do the benefits outweigh the drawbacks?”
Focus: Compare benefits vs. drawbacks and decide which is stronger.
Possible benefits: Language immersion; exposure to different teaching styles; international networks; stronger CV; independence.
Possible drawbacks: High costs/loans; culture shock/homesickness; visa/work limits; recognition/credit transfer issues.
Pitfall: Describing a travel holiday or emigration; keep the lens on education.

Example Box — Skeleton Plan (Outweigh)

Intro: Paraphrase + clear thesis (“benefits outweigh drawbacks because …”).
Body 1 (Benefits): B1 language/cultural capital → mechanism → micro-example; B2 academic/career capital → mechanism → micro-example.
Body 2 (Drawbacks): D1 cost → mitigation (scholarships/work) → micro-example; D2 homesickness → mitigation (support networks) → micro-example; weighing line.
Conclusion: Restate judgement + synthesis (“short-term costs vs long-term returns”).

Example Box — High-impact Sentences (Outweigh)

Thesis (decisive): “Although studying abroad involves meaningful costs, its academic and career dividends outweigh these drawbacks.”
Benefit topic: “Immersion compresses language learning timelines, which in turn boosts academic performance.”
Drawback topic (with mitigation): “Tuition and rent can strain budgets; however, scholarships and part-time work reduce the burden.”
Weighing line: “Short-term disruption is outweighed by long-term gains in skills, networks and employability.”
Conclusion line: “Overall, the returns on cultural and human capital exceed temporary adjustment costs.”

Example Box — Quick Quality Checks

Task: Clear judgement stated and maintained?
Development: Each claim has mechanism + micro-example?
Cohesion: Logical connectors used naturally (not overused)?
Balance: Drawbacks treated fairly before weighing?
Accuracy: Prepositions/articles and complex sentences correct?

Sentence-by-Sentence Scaffold (Outweigh)

Intro S1 (Paraphrase): Many students now consider studying abroad as an attractive option.

Intro S2 (Thesis/judgement): Although this path has drawbacks such as […], I argue its benefits outweigh them because […].

---

Body 1 S3 (Benefit topic): The main benefit is [… e.g., language immersion/academic quality …].

Body 1 S4 (Mechanism): Immersion leads to [… process …], which results in [… outcome …].

Body 1 S5 (Micro-example): For example, [… concise, plausible illustration …].

Body 1 S6 (Second benefit): A further advantage is [… e.g., global networks/employability …].

Body 1 S7 (Mechanism + link-back): Because [… mechanism …], graduates gain […], supporting the view that benefits are substantial.

---

Body 2 S8 (Drawback topic): Admittedly, students may face [… e.g., high costs/homesickness …].

Body 2 S9 (Mechanism of harm): This can cause [… impact …], especially when [… condition …].

Body 2 S10 (Mitigation): However, measures such as [… scholarships/part-time work/mentoring …] can reduce these risks.

Body 2 S11 (Weighing line): On balance, the long-term gains in […], […], and […] outweigh these short-term challenges.

---

Conclusion S12 (Restate judgement): In summary, despite […], studying abroad offers greater overall value.

Conclusion S13 (Synthesis): With sensible planning and support, its benefits in skills and opportunity clearly exceed its costs.

Paraphrase Options

P1: An increasing number of learners pursue degrees outside their home countries.
P2: Overseas study has become a common route for students seeking new academic experiences.

Thesis/Opinion Options (Outweigh)

Benefits outweigh: While costs and adaptation issues exist, the academic, linguistic and career returns are greater.
Balanced but leaning: Despite considerable expenses, the long-term skills gained generally tip the balance in favour of studying abroad.
Drawbacks outweigh (if chosen): For students without financial aid, the burdens may eclipse the gains, though targeted support could change this.

Task Title

Studying Abroad: Do the benefits outweigh the drawbacks?

Your Question

Question: Studying abroad is increasingly popular. Do the benefits outweigh the drawbacks? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

Another New [Writing Task 2] Question

Alternative Question: With the rapid growth of remote work, many employees now work from home. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? Support your view with reasons and examples. Write at least 250 words.

Timer & Controls

Write Your Essay Here

Submit for Feedback

When you click a send button, the automatic message will include: 1) the title of the exercise, 2) the full question, 3) your name, country, email, and WhatsApp number, and 4) your essay text.

In recent years, many students choose to study in another country. People often say this idea is exciting but difficult. In my view, although there are real problems, the advantages are more important in the long run. The main benefit is language and cultural immersion. When learners attend classes, talk to local people, and work on group projects every day, their skills improve faster than at home. This progress builds confidence and helps them perform better in seminars and exams. A second advantage is access to different teaching styles and stronger research facilities. For example, a student who joins a lab abroad may use equipment that is not available in their home university. This experience can open doors to internships and future jobs. However, there are drawbacks. The first is cost. Tuition, rent, and daily expenses can be high, and some families cannot support them. Another problem is homesickness and culture shock, especially in the first semester. Students may miss their families and feel alone. These issues are serious, but they can be reduced. Scholarships and part-time work can lower the financial pressure. Buddy programmes and student clubs can help newcomers build friendships and routines. On balance, the long-term gains outweigh the short-term problems. Students return with higher language proficiency, wider networks, and better independence. Employers often value these qualities. Therefore, while studying abroad is not easy and does not suit everyone, I believe it offers greater overall value for most learners who prepare carefully and use the support that universities provide.

Why this works (Band 6) — Step-by-Step

1. The introduction paraphrases the prompt and gives a clear opinion that benefits are more important.
2. It signals evaluation language (“in the long run”), which fits an outweigh question.
3. Body 1 starts with a focused topic sentence about immersion as the main benefit.
4. Mechanism is explained: daily interaction → faster skills → academic confidence.
5. A second benefit (teaching styles and facilities) adds breadth without listing many points.
6. There is a concrete, plausible micro-example about a lab and equipment.
7. Body 2 acknowledges real drawbacks: cost and homesickness/culture shock.
8. The drawbacks are explained with brief mechanisms (financial strain; loneliness).
9. Mitigation strategies are offered: scholarships, part-time work, buddy programmes.
10. A weighing move appears (“on balance”), comparing long-term gains to short-term issues.
11. The conclusion restates judgement and synthesises skills, networks, and independence.
12. Coherence devices are used simply (“However”, “On balance”, “Therefore”).
13. Examples remain realistic and not over-detailed, which suits timed conditions.
14. Vocabulary is adequate and mostly accurate for education topics.
15. Sentence structures are varied but remain mostly simple to lower error risk.
16. Task achieves 250+ words with a clear position maintained throughout.

As international programmes expand, studying abroad has moved from a niche choice to a mainstream route. While this path can be financially and emotionally demanding, I contend that its benefits outweigh the drawbacks because the gains in language, academic exposure and employability tend to be lasting. The strongest advantage is the accelerated development that immersion brings. Daily interaction with lecturers, peers and local communities compresses language learning timelines and builds pragmatic competence, which then feeds back into seminar performance and written work. A second advantage concerns academic breadth: host institutions often offer modules, laboratories and supervised projects that are unavailable at home. Even a short research placement can translate into credible experience on a CV and targeted references for graduate applications. The chief disadvantages should not be minimised. Fees and living costs can exceed family budgets; in addition, the first semester commonly involves culture shock, bureaucratic hurdles and a smaller support network. Nevertheless, these risks are not inevitable and can be mitigated. Scholarships, fee waivers and on-campus jobs reduce the financial burden, while mentoring schemes and international societies help newcomers form stable routines and friendships. Crucially, the timescale of costs and returns differs. Most pressures cluster in the early months and typically decline as students adapt, whereas the benefits—higher proficiency, broader academic capital and an international network—continue to pay dividends well after graduation. On balance, this asymmetry justifies the conclusion that studying abroad, for prepared and motivated learners, offers greater overall value than it costs. In sum, although the experience can be demanding, the combination of immersion, specialised opportunities and durable professional signals makes the advantages predominate in most cases.

Why this works (Band 7) — Step-by-Step

1. Introduction paraphrases precisely and states a firm outweigh position with reasons.
2. Lexis is more academic (e.g., “pragmatic competence”, “academic capital”, “asymmetry”).
3. Body 1 uses a cause-effect chain that links immersion to performance outcomes.
4. It adds a second, distinct benefit (breadth of modules, supervised projects).
5. Micro-example is concise and plausible (short research placement, CV value).
6. Body 2 acknowledges multiple drawbacks without exaggeration.
7. Mitigations are concrete: scholarships, waivers, jobs, mentoring, societies.
8. The weighing is explicit, contrasting timescale of costs vs returns.
9. Cohesion is controlled with varied devices and precise reference (“these risks”).
10. Topic sentences clearly guide the reader through each paragraph’s role.
11. Complex sentences are accurate; punctuation avoids comma splices.
12. Claims are measured, avoiding extreme generalisations.
13. Conclusion synthesises the rationale rather than repeating sentences verbatim.
14. Task focus remains on education, avoiding drift into tourism or emigration.
15. Word count supports development while staying concise for exam timing.
16. Overall, the answer maintains a consistent, well-reasoned judgement.

The surge in cross-border enrolments has made overseas study a routine decision rather than a rare privilege. Despite legitimate concerns about affordability and adjustment, I argue that its benefits decisively outweigh its drawbacks because they compound across language, learning, and labour-market outcomes. Foremost, immersion reshapes the pace and quality of learning. Constant exposure to discipline-specific discourse—lectures, lab briefings and peer critique—builds both fluency and the pragmatic skills required to operate in academic and professional settings. This competence often translates into stronger seminar contributions and clearer written work. Equally important is academic differentiation: host universities may offer niche modules, well-resourced laboratories and supervised projects that align with emerging industries. Even a semester-long placement can produce tangible artefacts—reports, datasets, prototypes—that signal capability beyond grades alone. The counter-case centres on cost and transition stress. Tuition and urban rents can strain budgets; culture shock and administrative complexity can sap attention in the first term. Yet these risks are predictable and therefore manageable: scholarships and targeted fee relief reduce fixed costs, while part-time campus roles and budgeting tools stabilise cash flow. Pastoral provision—peer mentors, counselling and international societies—accelerates adaptation. Crucially, the temporal profile of costs and returns is asymmetric. Financial and emotional pressures usually recede as routines form, but the gains—advanced proficiency, specialised knowledge and an international network—continue to accrue and compound after graduation. Graduates signal adaptability, intercultural awareness and initiative, traits that recruiters consistently reward. Overall, when reasonable support is available and students prepare deliberately, overseas study yields durable advantages whose magnitude and persistence exceed the temporary burdens that accompany the move.

Why this works (Band 8+) — Step-by-Step

1. Paraphrase is concise yet precise, framing the debate without clichés.
2. Thesis is decisive and forward-linked to reasons (“compound across…”).
3. Body 1 integrates mechanism chains from exposure to performance outcomes.
4. Discipline-specific discourse shows lexical control and topic relevance.
5. Academic differentiation adds depth beyond generic “better education”.
6. Concrete outputs (reports/datasets/prototypes) provide credible evidence.
7. Body 2 treats drawbacks seriously, avoiding straw-man arguments.
8. Mitigations are targeted: fixed vs variable costs; pastoral vs practical support.
9. Weighing uses a temporal asymmetry argument, a high-level evaluation move.
10. Cohesion is managed through logical sequencing rather than repeated linkers.
11. Nominal and verbal variety demonstrates grammatical range without error.
12. Claims are carefully hedged (“usually”, “when reasonable support is available”).
13. Register stays academic; no conversational fillers or overstatement.
14. Conclusion synthesises and echoes the weighing logic, not just restates.
15. Topic focus remains sharply on education, not travel or migration.
16. Overall control of argument, lexis and accuracy aligns with Band 8+ descriptors.