πŸ”Ά Part 1 β€” Tutorial & Strategy

How to Master Matching Headings: An Exam-Ready Guide

Goal: Match each paragraph with the heading that captures its main idea. Focus on the function of the paragraph, not on single words that look familiar.

Step 1 β€” Preview the Headings

Glance through the headings before reading. This builds a β€œmap” of possible themes: description, contrast, influence, criticism, or solution. Note which ones are broad (e.g., β€œA revolutionary design philosophy”) and which are narrow (e.g., β€œGlass as a symbol of openness”). Group similar ones together to avoid confusion later. Remind yourself that repeating vocabulary is a trap; the exam tests your ability to recognise the gist, not word-matching.

Step 2 β€” Skim for Gist

Read each paragraph quickly. Focus on the topic sentence and the conclusion line, which usually reveal the main idea. Ask: β€œIs this paragraph describing, explaining, or contrasting?” Write a short gist in 5–7 words (e.g., β€œHouse blends into nature”). Do not get stuck on technical termsβ€”context is enough. Keep moving to save time.

Step 3 β€” Match by Function

Every heading signals a type of paragraph: description, cause, effect, contrast, or evaluation. Match the function. If the paragraph praises or criticises, choose an evaluative heading. If it compares, look for words like β€œhowever” or β€œwhile.” If it describes a process, expect headings with sequence terms. Matching by function keeps you safe from word traps.

Step 4 β€” Eliminate and Confirm

Shortlist two headings per paragraph. Test each against the concluding line. Does one heading include the final emphasis better? Eliminate the weaker choice. Cross off used headings to reduce distraction. If unsure, move on and return laterβ€”context from other paragraphs often clarifies the fit.

Step 5 β€” Watch for Traps

Common traps include: 1) Word-match illusion: repeated words mislead. 2) Example magnet: details hide the main point. 3) Background decoy: opening history vs. concluding idea. 4) Scope mismatch: heading too broad/narrow. 5) Synonym shuffle: β€œharmony with environment” = β€œintegration with nature.” Always match the overall message.

Step 6 β€” Final Checks

Re-read your choices. Make sure each heading fits the whole paragraph, not just part of it. Confirm that two very specific headings are not assigned to different paragraphs. Answer all questionsβ€”even guesses are better than blanks. Matching Headings rewards strategy and speed more than perfection.

Example Box 1 β€” Main Idea vs. Detail

Gist: β€œWright’s Fallingwater shows harmony with nature.”

Correct heading: β€œIntegration with landscape.”

Why: The house is an example; the main idea is harmony.

Example Box 2 β€” Contrast

Gist: β€œWhile Europeans favoured glass boxes, Wright preferred organic forms.”

Correct heading: β€œA different vision from European modernism.”

Example Box 3 β€” Criticism

Gist: β€œLater designs criticised for lacking human scale.”

Correct heading: β€œCriticism of scale and comfort.”

Universal Answer Template

  1. β€œFor Paragraph [__], I choose Heading [__] because the paragraph’s function is [type].”
  2. β€œThe topic sentence presents [subject].”
  3. β€œSignals such as [however/as a result] show [contrast/cause].”
  4. β€œExamples like [Fallingwater] support, not replace, the main point.”
  5. β€œThe conclusion stresses [emphasis], matching the heading.”
  6. β€œThus Heading [__] best captures Paragraph [__].”
Quick Warm-Up

Mini-paragraph: β€œAlthough Wright valued modern technology, he insisted design must reflect nature.”

Choose: A) β€œTechnology as driver” β€’ B) β€œHarmony with nature” β€’ C) β€œEuropean influence.”

Answer: Function = philosophy; emphasis = nature; Heading B fits.

πŸ”· Part 2 β€” Reading Passage + Questions

[IELTS Academic] [Reading: Matching Headings] β€” Task

Instructions: Match the headings (i–xii) to the paragraphs (A–H). Write the correct Roman numeral next to each paragraph. There are more headings than paragraphs. Focus on the main idea of each paragraph.

⏳ Countdown Timer
20:00
List of Headings
  1. A philosophy of harmony with the natural world
  2. The Prairie Style and its break with tradition
  3. Fallingwater as the ultimate expression of organic design
  4. Wright’s influence on later modernist architects
  5. The role of glass and light in creating openness
  6. Cultural and critical responses to Wright’s later works
  7. The concept of the β€œUsonian” house for ordinary Americans
  8. The importance of Japan and travel in shaping Wright’s style
  9. A legacy of innovation beyond residential design
  10. Accusations of impracticality and extravagance
  11. Blending technology with craftsmanship
  12. Monumental public buildings as symbols of identity

There are more headings than paragraphs. Use each heading once at most.

Reading Passage β€” The Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright

Paragraph A β€” Frank Lloyd Wright’s architectural philosophy was anchored in the belief that buildings should grow naturally out of their environment. He rejected the idea of imposing foreign forms onto the land, insisting instead that design should harmonise with the contours, materials, and spirit of a site. Wright often described his work as β€œorganic architecture,” a phrase that captured both his aesthetic and moral approach. This philosophy stressed unity between structure and setting, where a house, for example, would not dominate its surroundings but appear as though it had always belonged there.

Paragraph B β€” The Prairie Style, which Wright pioneered in the early 20th century, marked a radical departure from conventional Victorian forms. Low, horizontal lines, broad overhanging roofs, and open interiors replaced the verticality and ornament of previous traditions. These features reflected the vast, flat landscapes of the American Midwest, offering a new architectural language rooted in regional identity. The Prairie houses expressed spaciousness and freedom, aligning with broader social aspirations of the period for simplicity and modern living.

Paragraph C β€” Wright’s philosophy found its most dramatic embodiment in Fallingwater, a house built partly over a waterfall in Pennsylvania. Completed in the 1930s, the structure appears to grow out of the rock itself, its cantilevered terraces extending boldly over the rushing water. Fallingwater has often been celebrated as the epitome of organic design, where architecture and nature intertwine so completely that neither can be imagined without the other. The building’s daring composition, praised worldwide, solidified Wright’s reputation as an innovator of extraordinary vision.

Paragraph D β€” Beyond his celebrated residences, Wright applied his ideas to a wide range of public and commercial projects. The Johnson Wax Headquarters, with its forest of mushroom-shaped columns, and the Guggenheim Museum in New York, with its spiralling ramp, demonstrate his ability to extend organic principles into large-scale, monumental forms. These works pushed architecture into new territory, influencing generations of designers who sought to break free from the rigid geometry of classical models.

Paragraph E β€” Wright’s enthusiasm for Japanese art and architecture also left a profound imprint on his style. His travels to Japan exposed him to concepts of asymmetry, spatial fluidity, and the delicate use of natural materials. He admired how Japanese buildings embraced gardens and courtyards as integral elements of design, and he incorporated these insights into his own projects. The Imperial Hotel in Tokyo, which survived the Great Kanto earthquake of 1923, was a striking testament to his synthesis of Western innovation and Eastern tradition.

Paragraph F β€” While many hailed his genius, Wright’s career was not free from criticism. Some accused his designs of being impractical, costly, or self-indulgent, especially in later works that seemed monumental in scale. Detractors argued that his visions, while inspiring, often ignored everyday functional concerns such as maintenance, affordability, and community needs. Yet even his critics acknowledged that his daring experiments expanded the possibilities of architecture as an art form.

Paragraph G β€” In response to such critiques, Wright promoted his concept of the β€œUsonian” house: affordable, functional homes for middle-class Americans. These modest dwellings incorporated open plans, natural lighting, and efficient use of space, aiming to democratise architectural beauty. The Usonian houses reflected his belief that good design should not be reserved for the wealthy but should uplift the lives of ordinary families, aligning with broader ideals of American democracy.

Paragraph H β€” Wright’s legacy extends far beyond his lifetime. His blending of natural forms, new technologies, and artistic vision influenced later modernists, from Mies van der Rohe to contemporary eco-architects. His buildings remain iconic not only for their innovation but also for the debates they continue to spark about the role of architecture in society. Whether admired as masterpieces or questioned for their feasibility, Wright’s works embody a restless spirit of experimentation that continues to inspire architects worldwide.

Answer Sheet
Your Selections

    
🟣 Part 3 β€” Answer Key

Model Answer β€” Matching Headings

Below is one defensible set of matches. Use it together with the justification boxes to learn how each choice follows the strategy in Part 1.

Answer Key (A–H)
  • A β†’ i (Drivers of magma formation beneath the crust)
  • B β†’ ii (How dissolved gases control the violence of eruptions)
  • C β†’ iv (Why water matters at subduction zones)
  • D β†’ vi (The sequence from magma ascent to ash fallout)
  • E β†’ vii (Close-range hazards and how they harm communities)
  • F β†’ ix (The far-reaching effects of fine ash on technology)
  • G β†’ viii (When volcanic debris mixes with water)
  • H β†’ x (Volcanoes and temporary shifts in global climate)

Unused headings: iii, v, xi, xii, xiii, xiv, xv.

Tip: Read the β€œGlobal Reasoning” box first, then scan each paragraph’s justification using the template from Part 1.

Why This Answer Set Is Strong β€” Global Reasoning (15–30 sentences)

The chosen headings prioritise function and emphasis rather than single word matches, which is the core Matching Headings strategy. Across the passage, each paragraph has a distinct rhetorical job: A provides upstream drivers, B explains a mechanism for explosivity, C narrows that mechanism to a special tectonic context, D sequences events, E lists proximal hazards, F expands to distal technological effects, G reframes a post-eruption hazard governed by landscape, and H evaluates climate-scale outcomes. This map shows a purposeful flow from causes to processes to effects at multiple scales; a good heading set mirrors that flow without duplicating scopes. Potential trapsβ€”such as focusing on the spectacle of lava (iii) or on general contrasts across settings (v)β€”are rejected when the paragraph’s emphasis points elsewhere (e.g., E centres on near-field harm rather than spectacle; A already integrates multiple settings under β€œdrivers,” making v too narrow and duplicative). Headings about monitoring (xii) or evacuation uncertainty (xiv) remain unused because no paragraph foregrounds decision-making or forecast ambiguity; any references to timing or anticipation in D support a sequence function, not a risk-governance function. Similarly, β€œbalancing benefits and costs” (xi) is excluded because although F nods to disruption and E to impacts, neither paragraph weighs benefits; H discusses climate impacts only as temporary forcing, not as a balanced evaluation. The mapping also respects scope integrity: D covers stages, so using vi fits perfectly, while applying vi to E or F would misrepresent their evaluative focus. For cohesion, each selected heading explains both the topic and the concluding emphasis; for example, H ends with climate linkage, aligning with heading x. Finally, unused headings remain plausible distractors that share vocabulary with the text but not its core functionsβ€”exactly the kind of IELTS decoys that the function-first method neutralises. In short, the selections align with topic sentences, pivot signals, concluding emphasis, and paragraph scope, satisfying every checkpoint in the universal template from Part 1.

Paragraph-by-Paragraph Justifications (Template Applied)
A β†’ i β€” Drivers of magma formation beneath the crust

Identification: Paragraph A surveys the sources of magma generation (divergence, plumes, subduction) and the role of volatilesβ€”this is a causes/drivers overview.

Topic Focus: The opening frames plate motions and mantle processes as the basis for volcanism, not a single setting.

Signal Words: β€œWhere…,” β€œElsewhere…,” β€œYet…” signal a catalogue of contexts unified by a common mechanism.

Evidence Role: Settings (ridges, plumes, arcs) are examples supporting the driver theme (decompression, heat, volatiles).

Emphasis Check: The close stresses β€œunderlying drivers… pressure release, heat transfer, addition of volatiles.”

Final Justification: Heading i captures the paragraph’s global cause map better than v (contrast) or xii (monitoring).

B β†’ ii β€” How dissolved gases control the violence of eruptions

Identification: Paragraph B explains a mechanism: viscosity and trapped gases leading to fragmentation.

Topic Focus: Silica-rich, viscous magma traps gas; gas exsolution triggers explosive behaviour.

Signal Words: β€œIn contrast” distinguishes quiet degassing from explosive shattering.

Evidence Role: Lava fountains and flows appear as outcomes of fluid magmas, not as the main idea.

Emphasis Check: The sentence β€œit is the dissolved gas itself… that loads the spring” foregrounds gases.

Final Justification: Heading ii matches function (cause–effect mechanism) and emphasis (gas control).

C β†’ iv β€” Why water matters at subduction zones

Identification: Paragraph C isolates water as the key subduction ingredient lowering melting points.

Topic Focus: Fluid release from the slab into the mantle wedge β†’ sticky, gas-rich magmas.

Signal Words: β€œBecause,” β€œAs,” β€œThus” articulate the causal chain from slab to explosivity.

Trap Avoidance: Not heading v (contrasting settings), because the focus is why water changes behaviour.

Final Justification: Heading iv names both the factor (water) and the context (subduction) precisely.

D β†’ vi β€” The sequence from magma ascent to ash fallout

Identification: Paragraph D is explicitly chronological, listing eruption stages.

Topic Focus: From ascent β†’ degassing β†’ column β†’ fallout β†’ possible column collapse β†’ waning.

Signal Words: β€œMay form,” β€œfollowed by,” β€œeventually” mark a temporal chain.

Scope Match: A process heading fits; hazard- or evaluation-based headings would be partial.

Final Justification: Heading vi is the only one naming a phase sequence from start to fallout.

E β†’ vii β€” Close-range hazards and how they harm communities

Identification: Paragraph E inventories proximal threats: pyroclastic surges, blocks, lava, heat, ash loading, gases.

Topic Focus: The emphasis is on near-field impacts and the need for exclusion zones and speed.

Trap Avoidance: Not iii (misleading lava spectacle), because the paragraph goes beyond lava to a comprehensive near-field risk set.

Emphasis Check: β€œMinutes matter” underlines harm and urgency to communities.

Final Justification: Heading vii best captures scope and emphasis.

F β†’ ix β€” The far-reaching effects of fine ash on technology

Identification: Paragraph F shows distal impacts: aviation, electronics, power systems, supply chains.

Topic Focus: Tiny particles cause large-scale disruption; technology is the main victim.

Trap Avoidance: Not x (climate), because the focus is infrastructure/operations, not radiative forcing.

Emphasis Check: Airports closing and grids flickering anchor the heading’s β€œfar-reaching” idea.

Final Justification: Heading ix names the agent (fine ash) and its domain (technology).

G β†’ viii β€” When volcanic debris mixes with water

Identification: Paragraph G defines laharsβ€”debris + waterβ€”emphasising valley-confined slurries.

Topic Focus: Post-eruption timing and landscape controls (slopes, ash thickness, channels).

Signal Words: β€œWhen,” β€œBecause,” β€œremain at risk” stress conditions and consequences.

Scope Match: A precise process (debris + water) rather than general hazards or climate.

Final Justification: Heading viii is an exact descriptor of the mechanism.

H β†’ x β€” Volcanoes and temporary shifts in global climate

Identification: Paragraph H explains stratospheric sulfur β†’ aerosols β†’ surface cooling.

Topic Focus: Planetary-scale yet temporary radiative impacts with ecological/economic knock-ons.

Evidence Role: Mentions of tree rings and records support the broader climate signal.

Trap Avoidance: Not xi (balancing benefits/costs); the paragraph does not weigh positives vs negatives.

Final Justification: Heading x aligns with both mechanism and timescale qualifier (β€œtemporary”).

Template-in-Action (Condensed Lines)

Paragraph A β†’ i: function: causes map; topic: ridge/plume/subduction drivers; signals: where/elsewhere/yet; reject: v.

Paragraph B β†’ ii: function: mechanism; topic: viscosity & gases; signals: in contrast; reject: iii.

Paragraph C β†’ iv: function: cause–effect with water; topic: slab fluids & sticky magmas; reject: v.

Paragraph D → vi: function: sequence; topic: ascent→column→fallout; signals: followed by/eventually.

Paragraph E β†’ vii: function: near-field hazard set; topic: surges/blocks/lava/gases; reject: iii.

Paragraph F β†’ ix: function: distal tech impacts; topic: aviation/electronics/grids; reject: x.

Paragraph G β†’ viii: function: definition & conditions; topic: lahars & landscape; signals: when/because.

Paragraph H β†’ x: function: climate forcing; topic: stratospheric aerosols; signals: temporary yet consequential.

🟒 Part 4 β€” Vocabulary

[IELTS Academic] [Reading: Matching Headings] β€” Vocabulary (Frank Lloyd Wright)

Each item gives: word β€’ BrE/AmE IPA β€’ part(s) of speech & pattern β€’ definition β€’ example + gloss β€’ synonyms β€’ common mistakes. Entries are concise to fit the frame on desktop and mobile.

Quick action: Copy all vocabulary items for offline study.

Organic architecture /Ι”ΛΛˆΙ‘Γ¦n.Ιͺk ΛˆΙ‘Λ.kΙͺ.tΙ›k.tΚƒΙ™/ β€’ /ɔːrˈɑæn.Ιͺk ΛˆΙ‘Λr.kΙ™.tek.tΚƒΙš/

n. (concept) β€’ pattern: organic architecture + of/that + [aim]

Def: Design that integrates a building with its site, materials, and surroundings.

Ex: β€œFallingwater exemplifies organic architecture.” (Means: the house and nature act as one.)

Syn: nature-integrated design. Mistakes: ❌ β€œorganical”; ❌ using it for β€œeco only”.

Prairie Style /ˈpreΙ™ri staΙͺl/ β€’ /ˈprΙ›ri staΙͺl/

n. (movement) β€’ pattern: the Prairie Style + features

Def: Wright’s early horizontal, low-roofed domestic style reflecting Midwestern landscapes.

Ex: β€œPrairie Style homes favour open plans.” (Meaning: interior flows rather than small rooms.)

Syn: horizontal domestic modernism. Mistakes: ❌ β€œprairies style”.

Cantilever /ˈkΓ¦n.tΙͺˌliː.vΙ™/ β€’ /ˈkΓ¦n.tΜ¬Ιͺˌliː.vɚ/

n./v. β€’ pattern: cantilevered + balcony/terrace

Def: A projecting structure fixed at one end and free at the other.

Ex: β€œTerraces cantilever over the falls.” (Meaning: they project without posts beneath.)

Syn: overhang. Mistakes: ❌ β€œcantalever”.

Horizontality /hΙ™ΛŒrΙͺ.zΙ’nˈtΓ¦l.Ιͺ.ti/ β€’ /hΙ™ΛŒrΙͺ.zɑːnˈtΓ¦l.Ι™.tΜ¬i/

n. β€’ pattern: emphasis on horizontality

Def: Design focus on long, low lines parallel to the ground.

Ex: β€œWright insisted on horizontality in faΓ§ades.” (Meaning: lines echo the landscape.)

Syn: lateral emphasis. Mistakes: ❌ spelling β€œhorizontalty”.

Overhang /ΛˆΙ™ΚŠ.vΙ™.hΓ¦Ε‹/ β€’ /ˈoʊ.vɚ.hΓ¦Ε‹/

n./v. β€’ pattern: deep roof overhangs

Def: A roof/element that extends beyond the wall below.

Ex: β€œOverhangs shade interiors.” (Meaning: they reduce glare/heat.)

Syn: eaves. Mistakes: ❌ β€œover hand”.

Spatial fluidity /ˈspeΙͺ.ΚƒΙ™l ˈfluː.Ιͺ.dΙͺ.ti/ β€’ /ˈspeΙͺ.ΚƒΙ™l ˈfluː.Ι™.dΙ™.tΜ¬i/

n. β€’ pattern: spatial fluidity between rooms

Def: Seamless movement and visual continuity through spaces.

Ex: β€œSliding screens create spatial fluidity.” (Meaning: spaces link rather than divide.)

Syn: flow; openness. Mistakes: ❌ β€œfluency” for spaces.

Transparency /trΓ¦nˈspΓ¦r.Ι™n.si/ β€’ /trΓ¦nˈspΓ¦r.Ι™n.si/

n. β€’ pattern: transparency through glass

Def: Visual openness allowing sight lines through/into space.

Ex: β€œRibbon windows increase transparency.” (Meaning: clearer views/light.)

Syn: visual openness. Mistakes: ❌ confusing with β€œpolicy transparency”.

Human scale /ˈhjuː.mΙ™n skeΙͺl/ β€’ /ˈhjuː.mΙ™n skeΙͺl/

n. β€’ pattern: attention to human scale

Def: Proportions comfortable and relatable to the human body.

Ex: β€œLow ceilings preserve human scale.” (Meaning: spaces feel intimate, not vast.)

Syn: humane proportion. Mistakes: ❌ using as β€œpopulation scale”.

Monumentality /ˌmΙ’n.juː.menˈtΓ¦l.Ιͺ.ti/ β€’ /ˌmɑːn.jΙ™.menˈtΓ¦l.Ι™.tΜ¬i/

n. β€’ pattern: sense of monumentality

Def: Formal grandeur or impressive mass/scale.

Ex: β€œThe museum’s monumentality dominates the street.” (Meaning: it feels iconic/huge.)

Syn: grandeur. Mistakes: ❌ equating with β€œmonuments only”.

Vernacular /vΙ™ΛˆnΓ¦k.jʊ.lΙ™/ β€’ /vɚˈnΓ¦k.jΙ™.lɚ/

adj./n. β€’ pattern: vernacular materials/forms

Def: Local, traditional building styles/materials.

Ex: β€œWright reinterprets vernacular stone.” (Meaning: local stone informs the design.)

Syn: regional, native. Mistakes: ❌ β€œvernacule”.

Usonian /juːˈsΙ™ΚŠ.ni.Ι™n/ β€’ /juːˈsoʊ.ni.Ι™n/

adj./n. β€’ pattern: Usonian house/dwelling

Def: Wright’s affordable, modest American house model.

Ex: β€œUsonian plans maximise utility.” (Meaning: small, smart layouts.)

Syn: democratic domestic design. Mistakes: ❌ β€œEurasian”.

Site-specific /ˌsaΙͺt spΙ™ΛˆsΙͺf.Ιͺk/ β€’ /ˌsaΙͺt spΙ™ΛˆsΙͺf.Ιͺk/

adj. β€’ pattern: site-specific response

Def: Designed uniquely for its location’s conditions.

Ex: β€œA site-specific plan follows the terrain.” (Meaning: layout fits the land.)

Syn: context-driven. Mistakes: ❌ confusing β€œsite” with β€œsight”.

Material palette /mΙ™ΛˆtΙͺΙ™.ri.Ι™l ˈpΓ¦l.et/ β€’ /mΙ™ΛˆtΙͺr.i.Ι™l ˈpΓ¦l.Ι™t/

n. β€’ pattern: a palette of [stone/wood/glass]

Def: The selected set of materials used in a design.

Ex: β€œA warm material palette grounds the house.” (Meaning: wood/stone feel natural.)

Syn: material set. Mistakes: ❌ spelling β€œpalate”.

Asymmetry /ˌeΙͺˈsΙͺm.Ιͺ.tri/ β€’ /ˌeΙͺˈsΙͺm.Ι™.tri/

n. β€’ pattern: deliberate asymmetry

Def: Balanced design without mirror equality.

Ex: β€œAsymmetry frames garden views.” (Meaning: off-center forms guide sight.)

Syn: non-symmetry. Mistakes: ❌ pronunciation β€œa-sym-MET-ry”.

Craftsmanship /ˈkrɑːft.smΙ™n.ΚƒΙͺp/ β€’ /ˈkrΓ¦ft.smΙ™n.ΚƒΙͺp/

n. β€’ pattern: fine craftsmanship in joinery

Def: Skilled manual/artisanal quality in making.

Ex: β€œCraftsmanship elevates simple forms.” (Meaning: details make quality visible.)

Syn: workmanship. Mistakes: ❌ β€œcraftman-ship”.

Structural innovation /ˈstrʌk.tΚƒΙ™r.Ι™l ˌΙͺn.Ι™ΛˆveΙͺ.ΚƒΙ™n/ β€’ /ˈstrʌk.tΚƒΙš.Ι™l ˌΙͺn.Ι™ΛˆveΙͺ.ΚƒΙ™n/

n. β€’ pattern: structural innovation through cantilevers

Def: New load-bearing ideas or systems.

Ex: β€œCantilevers show structural innovation.” (Meaning: new engineering enables form.)

Syn: engineering advance. Mistakes: ❌ using only for tech gadgets.

Critique /krΙͺˈtiːk/ β€’ /krΙͺˈtiːk/

n./v. β€’ pattern: critique of [cost/scale]

Def: Careful evaluation pointing out strengths/weaknesses.

Ex: β€œCritiques target impracticality.” (Meaning: some argue function suffers.)

Syn: evaluation. Mistakes: ❌ β€œcritic” as a verb.

Affordability /Ι™ΛŒfɔː.dΙ™ΛˆbΙͺl.Ιͺ.ti/ β€’ /Ι™ΛŒfɔːr.dΙ™ΛˆbΙͺl.Ι™.tΜ¬i/

n. β€’ pattern: affordability for middle-class families

Def: Being reasonably priced relative to income.

Ex: β€œUsonian ideals prioritise affordability.” (Meaning: design for ordinary budgets.)

Syn: cost-accessibility. Mistakes: ❌ β€œaffordable-ness”.

Legacy /ˈleΙ‘.Ι™.si/ β€’ /ˈlΙ›Ι‘.Ι™.si/

n. β€’ pattern: legacy of influence

Def: Lasting impact on later practitioners/ideas.

Ex: β€œWright’s legacy shaped modernists.” (Meaning: later architects adopt his ideas.)

Syn: lasting influence. Mistakes: ❌ using only for money/property.

Integration /ˌΙͺn.tΙͺˈɑreΙͺ.ΚƒΙ™n/ β€’ /ˌΙͺn.tΜ¬Ι™ΛˆΙ‘reΙͺ.ΚƒΙ™n/

n. β€’ pattern: integration of building and landscape

Def: Combining parts into a unified whole.

Ex: β€œIntegration makes the house belong to the site.” (Meaning: not imposed; it fits.)

Syn: synthesis, cohesion. Mistakes: ❌ β€œintegrity” for β€œintegration”.

Transparency (ethical vs. visual) /trΓ¦nˈspΓ¦r.Ι™n.si/ β€’ /trΓ¦nˈspΓ¦r.Ι™n.si/

n. β€’ pattern: visual transparency via glazing

Def: Here: visual clarity with glass; not honesty in governance.

Ex: β€œGlazing increases visual transparency.” (Meaning: more light and sight lines.)

Syn: see-through quality. Mistakes: ❌ mixing the two meanings in essays.

🟠 Part 5 β€” Phrases & Expressions

[IELTS Academic] [Reading: Matching Headings] β€” Phrases & Expressions (Frank Lloyd Wright)

Each entry includes: expression β€’ BrE/AmE IPA β€’ part(s) of speech & pattern β€’ definition β€’ example + gloss β€’ synonyms β€’ common mistakes. Concise for perfect frame-fit on desktop and mobile.

Quick action: Copy all expressions for offline study.

blend into the landscape /blΙ›nd ˌΙͺntuː Γ°Ι™ ˈlΓ¦nd.skeΙͺp/ β€’ /blΙ›nd ˌΙͺntu Γ°Ι™ ˈlΓ¦nd.skeΙͺp/

v. phrase β€’ pattern: blend into + the/its landscape

Def: Appear naturally part of the surrounding terrain.

Ex: β€œLow roofs help the house blend into the landscape.” (Meaning: it doesn’t visually dominate.)

Syn: merge with; harmonise with. Mistakes: ❌ β€œblend to”; use β€œinto”.

break with tradition /breΙͺk wΙͺΓ° trΙ™ΛˆdΙͺΚƒ.Ι™n/ β€’ /breΙͺk wΙͺΓ° trΙ™ΛˆdΙͺΚƒ.Ι™n/

v. phrase β€’ pattern: break with + tradition/convention

Def: Deliberately depart from established styles.

Ex: β€œThe Prairie Style breaks with tradition through horizontality.” (Meaning: rejects old norms.)

Syn: depart from. Mistakes: ❌ β€œbreak from tradition” (use β€œwith” for set phrase).

form follows function /fɔːm ˈfΙ’lΙ™ΚŠz ˈfΚŒΕ‹kΚƒΙ™n/ β€’ /fɔːrm ˈfɑːloʊz ˈfΚŒΕ‹kΚƒΙ™n/

clause (maxim) β€’ pattern: belief/principle that + form follows function

Def: Shape of a building should be determined by its use.

Ex: β€œOpen plans show that form follows function.” (Meaning: layout suits living needs.)

Syn: function-driven design. Mistakes: ❌ reversing to β€œfunction follows form”.

sense of place /sΙ›ns Ι™v pleΙͺs/ β€’ /sΙ›ns Ι™v pleΙͺs/

n. phrase β€’ pattern: a strong/clear sense of place

Def: Character that ties a building to its location.

Ex: β€œLocal stone gives the home a sense of place.” (Meaning: rooted in context.)

Syn: locality identity. Mistakes: ❌ β€œsense for place”.

open-plan living /ΛŒΙ™ΚŠ.pΙ™n ˈplΓ¦n ˈlΙͺv.ΙͺΕ‹/ β€’ /ˌoʊ.pΙ™n ˈplΓ¦n ˈlΙͺv.ΙͺΕ‹/

n. phrase β€’ pattern: open-plan + kitchen/living area

Def: Few internal walls; flowing spaces.

Ex: β€œOpen-plan living increases social interaction.” (Meaning: rooms connect.)

Syn: open layout. Mistakes: ❌ hyphen omission when attributive.

bring the outside in /brΙͺΕ‹ Γ°i ˈaʊt.saΙͺd Ιͺn/ β€’ /brΙͺΕ‹ Γ°i ˈaʊt.saΙͺd Ιͺn/

v. phrase β€’ pattern: bring the outside in with + glazing/courtyards

Def: Create continuity between interior and nature.

Ex: β€œLarge windows bring the outside in.” (Meaning: stronger indoor-outdoor link.)

Syn: blur interior–exterior. Mistakes: ❌ β€œbring outside to in”.

in dialogue with nature /Ιͺn ˈdaΙͺ.Ι™.lΙ’Ι‘ wΙͺΓ° ˈneΙͺ.tΚƒΙ™/ β€’ /Ιͺn ˈdaΙͺ.Ι™.lɔːɑ wΙͺΓ° ˈneΙͺ.tΚƒΙš/

prep. phrase β€’ pattern: be in dialogue with + nature/context

Def: Design responds to and converses with the environment.

Ex: β€œTimber faΓ§ades are in dialogue with nature.” (Meaning: materials echo setting.)

Syn: converse with; respond to. Mistakes: ❌ β€œin dialog” (spelling in BrE).

human-centred design /ˌhjuː.mΙ™n ˈsΙ›n.tΙ™d dΙͺˈzaΙͺn/ β€’ /ˌhjuː.mΙ™n ˈsΙ›n.tɚd dΙͺˈzaΙͺn/

n. phrase β€’ pattern: human-centred + approach/space

Def: Prioritising comfort, scale, and user needs.

Ex: β€œSeat heights show human-centred design.” (Meaning: sized for people.)

Syn: user-focused. Mistakes: ❌ missing hyphen when attributive.

site-driven design /saΙͺt ˈdrΙͺv.Ι™n dΙͺˈzaΙͺn/ β€’ /saΙͺt ˈdrΙͺv.Ι™n dΙͺˈzaΙͺn/

n. phrase β€’ pattern: site-driven + solution/layout

Def: Decisions shaped by the location’s constraints and qualities.

Ex: β€œTopography led to site-driven design.” (Meaning: terrain informed choices.)

Syn: context-led. Mistakes: ❌ β€œsight-driven”.

material honesty /mΙ™ΛˆtΙͺΙ™.ri.Ι™l ΛˆΙ’n.Ιͺs.ti/ β€’ /mΙ™ΛˆtΙͺr.i.Ι™l ΛˆΙ‘Λ.nΙͺs.ti/

n. phrase β€’ pattern: material honesty in + structure/finish

Def: Using materials truthfully, not disguising what they are.

Ex: β€œExposed stone shows material honesty.” (Meaning: not covered or faked.)

Syn: truthful materiality. Mistakes: ❌ β€œhonesty of materials” (ok but less idiomatic here).

play of light and shadow /pleΙͺ Ι™v laΙͺt Ι™n ΛˆΚƒΓ¦d.Ι™ΚŠ/ β€’ /pleΙͺ Ι™v laΙͺt Ι™n ΛˆΚƒΓ¦d.oʊ/

n. phrase β€’ pattern: the play of light and shadow on + surface/interior

Def: Visual effects created by illumination and shade.

Ex: β€œScreens enhance the play of light and shadow.” (Meaning: dynamic lighting.)

Syn: chiaroscuro (arch. sense). Mistakes: ❌ β€œlights and shadows” (plural not needed).

to cantilever over /tΙ™ ˈkΓ¦n.tΙͺˌliː.vΙ™ ΛˆΙ™ΚŠ.vΙ™/ β€’ /tΙ™ ˈkΓ¦n.tΜ¬Ιͺˌliː.vɚ ˈoʊ.vɚ/

v. phrase β€’ pattern: cantilever over + water/void

Def: Project outward with a fixed support at one end.

Ex: β€œTerraces cantilever over the falls.” (Meaning: extend unsupported.)

Syn: overhang. Mistakes: ❌ β€œcantilever on”.

ribbon windows /ˈrΙͺb.Ι™n ˈwΙͺn.dΙ™ΚŠz/ β€’ /ˈrΙͺb.Ι™n ˈwΙͺn.doʊz/

n. phrase β€’ pattern: use/install ribbon windows

Def: Long horizontal bands of glazing.

Ex: β€œRibbon windows increase transparency.” (Meaning: wider light/views.)

Syn: strip windows. Mistakes: ❌ β€œribbons windows”.

organic unity /Ι”ΛΛˆΙ‘Γ¦n.Ιͺk ˈjuː.nΙͺ.ti/ β€’ /ɔːrˈɑæn.Ιͺk ˈjuː.nΙ™.tΜ¬i/

n. phrase β€’ pattern: achieve organic unity between + parts

Def: All elements relate naturally as a whole.

Ex: β€œPlan, structure, and site aim for organic unity.” (Meaning: cohesive system.)

Syn: integral wholeness. Mistakes: ❌ using β€œorganic” to mean β€œeco only”.

structural daring /ˈstrʌk.tΚƒΙ™r.Ι™l ˈdeΙ™.rΙͺΕ‹/ β€’ /ˈstrʌk.tΚƒΙš.Ι™l ˈdΙ›r.ΙͺΕ‹/

n. phrase β€’ pattern: structural daring in + spans/cantilevers

Def: Bold engineering moves that test limits.

Ex: β€œCantilevers display structural daring.” (Meaning: brave engineering.)

Syn: engineering audacity. Mistakes: ❌ β€œstructure daring”.

economy of means /ΙͺˈkΙ’n.Ι™.mi Ι™v miːnz/ β€’ /Ιͺˈkɑː.nΙ™.mi Ι™v miːnz/

n. phrase β€’ pattern: achieve economy of means with + simple details

Def: Doing more with fewer resources.

Ex: β€œStandard modules show economy of means.” (Meaning: efficient use of parts.)

Syn: efficiency; parsimony (formal). Mistakes: ❌ β€œeconomic of means”.

democratise design /dΙͺˈmΙ’k.rΙ™.taΙͺz dΙͺˈzaΙͺn/ β€’ /dΙͺˈmɑː.krΙ™.taΙͺz dΙͺˈzaΙͺn/

v. phrase β€’ pattern: democratise + housing/design

Def: Make good design accessible to ordinary people.

Ex: β€œUsonian homes sought to democratise design.” (Meaning: affordability + quality.)

Syn: broaden access. Mistakes: ❌ β€œdemocratize the people design”.

spatial continuity /ˈspeΙͺ.ΚƒΙ™l ˌkΙ’n.tΙͺˈnjuː.Ιͺ.ti/ β€’ /ˈspeΙͺ.ΚƒΙ™l ˌkɑːn.tΙͺˈnuː.Ι™.tΜ¬i/

n. phrase β€’ pattern: spatial continuity between + rooms/inside-outside

Def: Unbroken flow across adjoining spaces.

Ex: β€œCourtyards enhance spatial continuity.” (Meaning: spaces link visually/physically.)

Syn: spatial flow. Mistakes: ❌ β€œcontinuation” for this concept.

push the boundaries /pΚŠΚƒ Γ°Ι™ ˈbaʊn.d(Ι™)r.iz/ β€’ /pΚŠΚƒ Γ°Ι™ ˈbaʊn.d(Ι™)r.iz/

v. phrase β€’ pattern: push the boundaries of + design/structure

Def: Extend the limits of what is typical or safe.

Ex: β€œThe museum pushes the boundaries of form.” (Meaning: highly innovative.)

Syn: break new ground. Mistakes: ❌ β€œpush the limits of boundary”.

a departure from /Ι™ dΙͺˈpɑː.tΚƒΙ™ frΙ’m/ β€’ /Ι™ dΙͺˈpɑːr.tΚƒΙš frʌm/

n. phrase β€’ pattern: a departure from + tradition/ornament

Def: A noticeable change away from previous practice.

Ex: β€œFlat roofs were a departure from Victorian norms.” (Meaning: contrast with old style.)

Syn: shift away from. Mistakes: ❌ β€œdeparture of”.

πŸ”Ί Part 6 β€” Vocabulary & Expressions Quiz

[IELTS Academic] [Reading: Matching Headings] β€” Interactive Exercise

Question type: MCQ. You will get 10 random questions from a pool of 50. After each answer, an immediate, detailed explanation (10–15 short sentences) appears below the question. Content is frame-fit and fully responsive.

Progress: 0/10 Score: 0

Press β€œStart / New Set” to begin.